h1

When Michael met Bojo

7 May 2008

New, bike-commuting London mayor Boris Johnson – who will henceforth be referred to on The Plummet Onions by his latest nickname, Bojo – has made his first mark by outlawing the drinking of alcohol on London’s transport systems. No more cans of lager on the tube or bus from the beginning of next month.

This is the first move in a plan Bojo made very clear during his campaign: to be tough on London crime using the model that New York City used in the mid-’90s. That is, if you’re tough on the minor crimes, on the smaller anti-social behaviours, it removes the type of environment that results in bigger crimes. Bojo’s so keen to follow in NYC’s kinder, gentler footsteps that that city’s mayor, Michael Bloomberg, will be here on Friday to have a face-to-face with our new Etonian leader.

I wonder about this direction for two reasons:

  1. I’m not sure that the cause-and-effect of the broken-window policy in NYC is true. There seems to be debate about how much was due to those policies, how much was due to larger societal trends, better crime management and statistics tools, or even the controversial Freakonomics legal abortion link. Getting nitpicky with public behaviour may not change overall crime.
  2. I’m not sure that London is really that crime-ridden. Of course if you read The Sun or any other conservative tabloid you think it is. Bojo ran on a tough-against-crime platform, and he won, so some people must believe it. Crime stats are hard to summarize, since there are many types of crime, and they can go up and down in different areas. But I haven’t seen any attempts at all to do such a summary: just heated reported of any particular knife crime or shooting and lusty cries that something must be done to prevent them ever again. My eyeballing of several types of crime in several boroughs over several years from the Met’s stats page leads me to believe that overall crime may not be that bad to begin with and may be getting better in many (most?) areas.

That aside, Bojo may not have thought out some of the more obvious implications of this no-transport-drinking policy, though, as explained by Rail Maritime & Transport union leader Bob Crow:

Perhaps the mayor will come out with his underpants on over his trousers like Superman one Saturday to show us how it should be done, and maybe tell a crowd of Liverpool supporters that they can’t drink on the train.

To be fair, though, I think his plan to provide more weekend activities for city youth is an admirable idea. I do believe that having something to do (which makes you meet people and develop goals) is essential for kids’ development.

4 comments

  1. Interesting …


  2. Commuter mainline services seem to be excluded from this policy. The Waterloo brigade can still quaff a tinny or a mini G&T on the way back to the burbs.


  3. There is a chapter on crime in Freakonomics, and in there the authors show that the falling crime in NYC had nothing to do with the hardline policy or the rising police numbers.

    I could tell you what they said the real cause was, but it’s a spoiler. Let me know if you want to know.

    It’s a good book.

    The way I seen in Bojo (great name) just wants to be seen to be doing things.


  4. Uh, yeah, I’ve read it. If you’ll read my post again you’ll see that I clearly mentioned Freakonomics and their hypothesis of the reason behind the crime drop.



Leave a Comment